Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 48
Filtrar
1.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 49(5): 42-48, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476921

RESUMO

The Phadiatop Infant® (PhInf) is a panel developed to assess allergic sensitization (immunoglobulin E [IgE]) in children aged <5 years and combines inhalant and food allergens. The test has not been evaluated outside Europe. This is a cross-sectional study conducted at 11 pediatric allergy centers to evaluate PhInf as an allergic disease screening method in Brazilian children. Children as controls and patients (aged 6 months-18 years) were grouped according to their primary disease and age group. PhInf and specific serum IgE (sIgE) screening was performed for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), cat and dog epithelia, a mix of grasses and pollens, eggs, cow's milk, peanuts, and shrimp. Values ≥ 0.35 kUA/L (or PAU/L) were considered positive. A total of 470 children and adolescents, which included 385 patients and 85 controls, participated in the study (47.7% boys, average age: 6.3 years). In all, 72.6% of the participants had positive PhInf test (n = 341), with a higher proportion of those having food allergy (92.6%), atopic dermatitis (91.9%), and those aged >13 years having allergy (95%). The PhInf and sIgE agreement between patients (Kappa = 0.94, P < 0.001) and controls (Kappa = 0.84, P < 0.001) was high. PhInf and DP agreement in patients aged >13 years was excellent (Kappa = 0.936, P < 0.001). Compared with sIgE dosage, PhInf had high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (93%). Positivity of PhInf test in this population was high and had an excellent correlation with the allergens comprising the panel. It is a useful method for screening children suspected of having allergic diseases in a non-European country.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Laboratórios , Adolescente , Alérgenos , Animais , Gatos , Bovinos , Estudos Transversais , Cães , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E , Lactente
2.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 49(5): 42-48, sept. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-214765

RESUMO

The Phadiatop Infant® (PhInf) is a panel developed to assess allergic sensitization (immunoglobulin E [IgE]) in children aged <5 years and combines inhalant and food allergens. The test has not been evaluated outside Europe. This is a cross-sectional study conducted at 11 pediatric allergy centers to evaluate PhInf as an allergic disease screening method in Brazilian children. Children as controls and patients (aged 6 months–18 years) were grouped according to their primary disease and age group. PhInf and specific serum IgE (sIgE) screening was performed for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), cat and dog epithelia, a mix of grasses and pollens, eggs, cow’s milk, peanuts, and shrimp. Values ≥ 0.35 kUA/L (or PAU/L) were considered positive. A total of 470 children and adolescents, which included 385 patients and 85 controls, participated in the study (47.7% boys, average age: 6.3 years). In all, 72.6% of the participants had positive PhInf test (n = 341), with a higher proportion of those having food allergy (92.6%), atopic dermatitis (91.9%), and those aged >13 years having allergy (95%). The PhInf and sIgE agreement between patients (Kappa = 0.94, P < 0.001) and controls (Kappa = 0.84, P < 0.001) was high. PhInf and DP agreement in patients aged >13 years was excellent (Kappa = 0.936, P < 0.001). Compared with sIgE dosage, PhInf had high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (93%). Positivity of PhInf test in this population was high and had an excellent correlation with the allergens comprising the panel. It is a useful method for screening children suspected of having allergic diseases in a non-European country (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Imunoglobulina E , Laboratórios
3.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 13: 1975-1981, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33364779

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Allergic rhinitis (AR) represents a large burden to the healthcare system due to its high prevalence and impact on patients' lives. Despite the existence of evidence-based guidelines, some studies have found that physicians do not always follow the latest recommendations. The aim of our study was to determine how Ecuadorian otorhinolaryngologists (ENTs) perceive some epidemiological aspects related to AR, as well as their preferences for managing the disease. METHODS: We conducted an observational, survey-based cross-sectional study, among 116 Ecuadorian ENTs. The survey used was adapted from a previous publication and consisted of 30 multiple choice questions, concerning several topics of AR. Descriptive statistics (frequency, and standard deviation) were performed for clinical and demographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 116 Ecuadorian ENTs completed the survey. Of them, 62.9% were male, with an average age of 42 years (SD ± 11.58). Computed tomography (CT) scan and nasal cytology were selected as the main diagnostic tests for AR by 62/91 (68.1%) and 45/91 (49.5%) of participants, respectively. Moreover, only 12/116 (10.3%) of participants performed skin prick tests (SPT). Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) was performed by 37/107 (36.4%) of participants. CONCLUSION: In general, most participants agreed that the prevalence of AR appears to be increasing, with increased exposure to allergens, irritants, and pollutants as the main probable cause. Children and adolescents were accounted as the group most affected by AR, with sinusitis and asthma identified as the most frequent comorbidities. Finally, we found unmet needs in the diagnostic and management of AR that should be addressed among Ecuadorian ENTs, in particular the high use of CT scans as part of routine evaluations, as well as the low use of allergen immunotherapy.

4.
Arq. Asma, Alerg. Imunol ; 4(1): 3-34, jan.mar.2020. ilus
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1381780

RESUMO

Asma grave é a asma que requer tratamento com altas doses de corticosteroide inalado associado a um segundo medicamento de controle (e/ou corticosteroide sistêmico) para impedir que se torne "descontrolada" ou permaneça "descontrolada" apesar do tratamento. Asma grave é considerada um subtipo de asma de difícil tratamento. A prevalência em crianças evidenciada pelo International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood variou entre 3,8% e 6,9%. Existem diversos instrumentos para avaliação subjetiva, como diários de sintomas e questionários, bem como para avaliação objetiva com função pulmonar e avaliação da inflamação por escarro induzido, ou óxido nítrico exalado. A abordagem terapêutica varia desde doses altas de corticosteroide inalado e/ou oral, broncodilatadores de longa duração, antaganonistas de receptores muscarínicos, até os mais recentes imunobiológicos que bloqueiam a IgE ou IL-5.


Severe asthma is asthma that requires treatment with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids in combination with a second control drug (and/or a systemic corticosteroid) to prevent it from becoming "uncontrolled" or remaining "uncontrolled" despite treatment. Severe asthma is considered a difficult-to-treat asthma subtype. The prevalence in children found by the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood ranged from 3.8% to 6.9%. There are several instruments for subjective assessment, such as symptom diaries and questionnaires, as well as for objective assessment, including pulmonary function testing and evaluation of inflammation by induced sputum or exhaled nitric oxide. The therapeutic approach includes high doses of inhaled and/or oral corticosteroids, long-acting bronchodilators, muscarinic receptor antagonists, and the latest biologics that block IgE or IL-5.


Assuntos
Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Pediatria , Asma , Sociedades Médicas , Broncodilatadores , Imunoglobulina E , Interleucina-5 , Corticosteroides , Terapia Respiratória , Sinais e Sintomas , Sinusite , Escarro , Terapêutica , Prega Vocal , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Vacinas contra Influenza , Prevalência , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Alergia e Imunologia , Rinite Alérgica , Omalizumab , Óxido Nítrico , Obesidade
6.
Arq. Asma, Alerg. Imunol ; 3(3): 207-258, jul.set.2019. ilus
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1381240

RESUMO

O presente guia apresenta revisão extensa sobre imunobiológicos utilizados, liberados e ainda sob estudo, para o tratamento da asma, doenças alérgicas e imunodeficiências. Além das características físico-químicas de alguns desses fármacos, são revisadas as indicações e os resultados de estudos clínicos realizados para avaliar eficácia e segurança. Separados por doença específica, são apresentados os principais agentes disponíveis e aprovados para utilização segundo as normas regulatórias nacionais.


This guide presents an extensive review of immunobiological drugs used, approved and/or under investigation for the treatment of asthma, allergic diseases and immunodeficiencies. In addition to the physicochemical characteristics of some of these drugs, their indications and results of clinical studies evaluating efficacy and safety are reviewed. The main agents available and approved for use in each specific disease according to national regulatory standards are presented.


Assuntos
Humanos , Asma , Sinusite , Terapia Biológica , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Dermatite Atópica , Angioedemas Hereditários , Omalizumab , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Urticária Crônica , Anafilaxia , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Segurança , Terapêutica , Produtos Biológicos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Doença , Eficácia , Citocinas , Regulamentação Governamental , Alergia e Imunologia , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência , Imunoterapia
11.
Arq. Asma, Alerg. Imunol ; 2(2): 163-208, abr.jun.2018. ilus
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1380819

RESUMO

A asma é uma das doenças crônicas de maior frequência na infância. Parcela significativa de crianças com asma desenvolve sintomas nos primeiros anos de vida, mas nem sempre a sua confirmação diagnóstica é fácil. Outras causas de sibilância que podem gerar confusão diagnóstica, além da complexidade para a obtenção de medidas objetivas, tais como a realização de provas de função pulmonar nessa faixa etária, são justificativas para esse fato. Especialistas na abordagem desses pacientes, da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia e da Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, após revisão extensa da literatura pertinente elaboraram esse documento, onde são comentados os possíveis agentes etiológicos, prevalência, diagnóstico diferencial, assim como tratamento e prevenção da sibilância e asma em pré-escolares.


Asthma is one of the most frequent chronic diseases in childhood. A significant portion of children with asthma develop symptoms in the first years of life, but diagnostic confirmation is not always easy. The difficulty is justified by other causes of wheezing that can generate diagnostic confusion, and by the complexity involved in obtaining objective measures ­ such as pulmonary function tests ­ in this age group. Specialists with expertise in the approach of these patients, from both the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology and the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics, after extensive review of the pertinent literature, developed this document to discuss possible etiological agents, prevalence, differential diagnosis, as well as treatment and prevention of wheezing and asthma in preschool children.


Assuntos
Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Pacientes , Asma , Sociedades Médicas , Sons Respiratórios , Guias como Assunto , Pediatria , Associação , Testes de Função Respiratória , Vírus Sinciciais Respiratórios , Retroviridae , Sinais e Sintomas , Terapêutica , Bactérias , Doença Crônica , Prevalência , Enterovirus Humano D , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Alergia e Imunologia , Grupos Etários
12.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 73: e310, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29723342

RESUMO

Hereditary angioedema is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by recurrent angioedema attacks with the involvement of multiple organs. The disease is unknown to many health professionals and is therefore underdiagnosed. Patients who are not adequately diagnosed and treated have an estimated mortality rate ranging from 25% to 40% due to asphyxiation by laryngeal angioedema. Intestinal angioedema is another important and incapacitating presentation that may be the main or only manifestation during an attack. In this article, a group of experts from the "Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI)" and the "Grupo de Estudos Brasileiro em Angioedema Hereditário (GEBRAEH)" has updated the Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema.


Assuntos
Angioedemas Hereditários/diagnóstico , Angioedemas Hereditários/classificação , Angioedemas Hereditários/fisiopatologia , Brasil , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/análise , Complemento C4/análise , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos
13.
Clinics ; 73: e310, 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-890748

RESUMO

Hereditary angioedema is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by recurrent angioedema attacks with the involvement of multiple organs. The disease is unknown to many health professionals and is therefore underdiagnosed. Patients who are not adequately diagnosed and treated have an estimated mortality rate ranging from 25% to 40% due to asphyxiation by laryngeal angioedema. Intestinal angioedema is another important and incapacitating presentation that may be the main or only manifestation during an attack. In this article, a group of experts from the "Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI)" and the "Grupo de Estudos Brasileiro em Angioedema Hereditário (GEBRAEH)" has updated the Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema.


Assuntos
Humanos , Angioedemas Hereditários/diagnóstico , Brasil , Complemento C4/análise , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/análise , Angioedemas Hereditários/classificação , Angioedemas Hereditários/fisiopatologia
14.
Arq. Asma, Alerg. Imunol ; 1(1): 23-48, jan.mar.2017. ilus
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1380301

RESUMO

O angioedema hereditário é uma doença autossômica dominante caracterizada por crises de edema com o envolvimento de múltiplos órgãos. A doença é desconhecida por muitos profissionais da área da saúde e, portanto, subdiagnosticada. Os pacientes que não são diagnosticados e tratados adequadamente têm uma mortalidade estimada de 25% a 40%, devido ao angioedema da laringe, resultando em asfixia. O angioedema de alças intestinais é outra manifestação importante e incapacitante, que pode ser a principal ou a única durante uma crise da doença. Neste cenário, um grupo de especialistas da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) e do Grupo de Estudos Brasileiro em Angioedema Hereditário (GEBRAEH) atualizou as diretrizes para o diagnóstico e terapia do angioedema hereditário.


Hereditary angioedema is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by edema attacks with the involvement of multiple organs. The disease is unknown to many health professionals and is therefore underdiagnosed. Patients who are not adequately diagnosed and treated have an estimated mortality rate ranging from 25% to 40%, due to laryngeal angioedema, which results in asphyxia. Angioedema affecting bowel loops is another important, incapacitating presentation that may be the main or only manifestation during a crisis. In this scenario, a group of experts affiliated with Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) and Grupo de Estudos Brasileiro em Angioedema Hereditário (GEBRAEH) has updated the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , História do Século XXI , Guias como Assunto , Alergia e Imunologia , Angioedemas Hereditários/tratamento farmacológico , Terapêutica , Diagnóstico , Angioedema Hereditário Tipos I e II
15.
Pediatr. mod ; 48(2)fev. 2012.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-661186

RESUMO

Revisão do sempre momentoso tema da alergia às proteínas do leite de vaca, o trabalho trata de sua definição, frequência, diagnóstico clínico, exames complementares e tratamento. Neste particular, aborda as medidas terapêuticas a serem tomadas em situações de emergência e no decorrer da evolução do processo.


Assuntos
Humanos , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/terapia , Substitutos do Leite Humano
16.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 66(9): 1573-7, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22179162

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asthma and rhinitis often coexist, which potentially increases the disease severity and can negatively impact a patients' quality of life. However, there are few reports based on data obtained from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood examining asthma severity in combination with rhinitisrelated symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate whether current rhinitis and current rhinoconjunctivitis are associated with the development of asthma or its increasing severity in Brazilian adolescents. METHODS: The prevalence of current asthma was correlated with the prevalence of current rhinitis and current rhinoconjunctivitis in adolescents (13 to 14 year olds) from 16 Brazilian centers (based on Spearman's rank correlation index). The influence of current rhinitis and current rhinoconjunctivitis on asthma presentation was also evaluated using the chi-squared test and was expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was observed between the prevalence of current asthma and current rhinitis (rs = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.60-0.93, p< 0.0001) and between the prevalence of current asthma and current rhinoconjunctivitis (rs = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.47-0.89, p < 0.0001). Current rhinitis was associated with a significantly increased risk of current asthma and of more severe asthma. Similar results were observed for current rhinoconjunctivitis. CONCLUSION: In this epidemiologic study of Brazilian adolescents, the presence of current rhinitis and current rhinoconjunctivitis was associated with a high risk of developing asthma and increased asthma severity. The mutual evaluation of rhinitis and asthma is necessary to establish an adequate treatment plan.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Conjuntivite/epidemiologia , Rinite/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Brasil/epidemiologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Obstrução Nasal/epidemiologia , Sons Respiratórios/fisiologia , Fatores de Risco , Espirro/fisiologia
17.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 66(9): 1627-36, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22179171

RESUMO

Hereditary angioedema is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by edema attacks with multiple organ involvement. It is caused by a quantitative or functional deficiency of the C1 inhibitor, which is a member of the serine protease inhibitor family. Hereditary angioedema is unknown to many health professionals and is therefore an underdiagnosed disease. The causes of death from hereditary angioedema include laryngeal edema with asphyxia. The estimated mortality rate in patients in whom the disease goes undetected and who are therefore incorrectly treated is 25-40%. In addition to edema of the glottis, hereditary angioedema often results in edema of the gastrointestinal tract, which can be incapacitating. Patients with hereditary angioedema may undergo unnecessary surgical interventions because the digestive tract can be the primary or only organ system involved, thus mimicking acute surgical abdomen. It is estimated that patients with hereditary angioedema experience some degree of disability 20-100 days per year. The Experts in Clinical Immunology and Allergy of the "Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunopatologia -ASBAI" developed these guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and management of hereditary angioedema.


Assuntos
Angioedemas Hereditários/diagnóstico , Angioedemas Hereditários/terapia , Brasil , Humanos
18.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 66(6): 943-7, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21808856

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the Online Latin American Survey of Anaphylaxis (OLASA) were to identify the main clinical manifestations, triggers, and treatments of severe allergic reactions in patients who were seen by allergists from July 2008 to June 2010 in 15 Latin American countries and Portugal (n =634). RESULTS: Of all patients, 68.5% were older than 18 years, 41.6% were male, and 65.4% experienced the allergic reaction at home. The etiologic agent was identified in 87.4% of cases and predominantly consisted of drugs (31.2%), foods (23.3%), and insect stings (14.9%). The main symptom categories observed during the acute episodes were cutaneous (94.0%) and respiratory (79.0%). The majority of patients (71.6%) were treated initially by a physician (office/emergency room) within the first hour after the reaction occurred (60.2%), and 43.5% recovered in the first hour after treatment. Most patients were treated in an emergency setting, but only 37.3% received parenteral epinephrine alone or associated with other medication. However, 80.5% and 70.2% were treated with corticosteroids or antihistamines (alone or in association), respectively. A total of 12.9% of the patients underwent reanimation maneuvers, and 15.2% were hospitalized. Only 5.8% of the patients returned to the emergency room after discharge, with 21.7% returning in the first 6 hours after initial treatment. CONCLUSION: The main clinical manifestations of severe allergic reactions were cutaneous. The etiologic agents that were identified as causing these acute episodes differed according to age group. Following in order: drugs (31.2%), foods (23.3% and insect stings (14.9%) in adults with foods predominance in children. Treatment provided for acute anaphylactic reactions was not appropriate. It is necessary to improve educational programs in order to enhance the knowledge on this potentially fatal emergency.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , América Latina/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Portugal/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
Clinics ; 66(6): 943-947, 2011. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-594359

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the Online Latin American Survey of Anaphylaxis (OLASA) were to identify the main clinical manifestations, triggers, and treatments of severe allergic reactions in patients who were seen by allergists from July 2008 to June 2010 in 15 Latin American countries and Portugal (n =634). RESULTS: Of all patients, 68.5 percent were older than 18 years, 41.6 percent were male, and 65.4 percent experienced the allergic reaction at home. The etiologic agent was identified in 87.4 percent of cases and predominantly consisted of drugs (31.2 percent), foods (23.3 percent), and insect stings (14.9 percent). The main symptom categories observed during the acute episodes were cutaneous (94.0 percent) and respiratory (79.0 percent). The majority of patients (71.6 percent) were treated initially by a physician (office/emergency room) within the first hour after the reaction occurred (60.2 percent), and 43.5 percent recovered in the first hour after treatment. Most patients were treated in an emergency setting, but only 37.3 percent received parenteral epinephrine alone or associated with other medication. However, 80.5 percent and 70.2 percent were treated with corticosteroids or antihistamines (alone or in association), respectively. A total of 12.9 percent of the patients underwent reanimation maneuvers, and 15.2 percent were hospitalized. Only 5.8 percent of the patients returned to the emergency room after discharge, with 21.7 percent returning in the first 6 hours after initial treatment. CONCLUSION: The main clinical manifestations of severe allergic reactions were cutaneous. The etiologic agents that were identified as causing these acute episodes differed according to age group. Following in order: drugs (31.2 percent), foods (23.3 percent and insect stings (14.9 percent) in adults with foods predominance in children. Treatment provided for acute anaphylactic reactions was not appropriate. It is necessary to improve educational programs in order to enhance the knowledge on this potentially fatal emergency.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Anafilaxia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/métodos , Distribuição por Idade , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , América Latina/epidemiologia , Portugal/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Clinics ; 66(9): 1573-1577, 2011. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-604296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asthma and rhinitis often coexist, which potentially increases the disease severity and can negatively impact a patients' quality of life. However, there are few reports based on data obtained from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood examining asthma severity in combination with rhinitisrelated symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate whether current rhinitis and current rhinoconjunctivitis are associated with the development of asthma or its increasing severity in Brazilian adolescents. METHODS: The prevalence of current asthma was correlated with the prevalence of current rhinitis and current rhinoconjunctivitis in adolescents (13 to 14 year olds) from 16 Brazilian centers (based on Spearman's rank correlation index). The influence of current rhinitis and current rhinoconjunctivitis on asthma presentation was also evaluated using the chi-squared test and was expressed as odds ratios with 95 percent confidence intervals (95 percentCI). RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was observed between the prevalence of current asthma and current rhinitis (rs = 0.82; 95 percentCI: 0.60-0.93, p< 0.0001) and between the prevalence of current asthma and current rhinoconjunctivitis (rs = 0.75; 95 percentCI: 0.47-0.89, p < 0.0001). Current rhinitis was associated with a significantly increased risk of current asthma and of more severe asthma. Similar results were observed for current rhinoconjunctivitis. CONCLUSION: In this epidemiologic study of Brazilian adolescents, the presence of current rhinitis and current rhinoconjunctivitis was associated with a high risk of developing asthma and increased asthma severity. The mutual evaluation of rhinitis and asthma is necessary to establish an adequate treatment plan.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Humanos , Asma/epidemiologia , Conjuntivite/epidemiologia , Rinite/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Obstrução Nasal/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Sons Respiratórios/fisiologia , Espirro/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...